The Sales Tactic That Kills Trust-Based Brands

•

Keith Dragon

A message shows up on LinkedIn. Someone’s read your work. They ask a genuinely good question — the kind that makes you think: “finally, someone who gets it.” You answer. A few days or weeks pass. Another message. Another sharp observation about your industry or your work. You start to think this person might actually be paying attention.

Then, right on schedule, another message arrives. And there it is: the pitch. You knew it was coming and that it would be wrapped in the same curious tone as the first messages, except now you can see the curiosity was not real.

If you’ve been in business more than five minutes, you’ve lived this. It has a name in sales training circles: INSIGHT → PAIN → QUESTION. Lead with something that appears to have value. Connect it to a problem. Ask a question that feels personal. Use rapport to build just enough to get your foot in the door, then pivot.

Makes sense — right?

This technique is taught. It’s common. And for a huge swath of businesses, it barely matters — a widget doesn’t care how it got sold. But if you’re a soloprenuer, a coach, a consultant, an advisor — where you are the product — this tactic to pivot too soon can do real damage to the thing you can least afford to lose: trust.

Recognize the Sequence, Not Just the Pitch

The tell isn’t that someone has an agenda. Everyone does. The tell is speed relative to depth. Real discovery takes time and adapts to what it finds. A sequence doesn’t adapt — when it hits a roadblock it proceeds on a schedule.

Watch for these markers:

  • The questions get shallower as the messages continue, not deeper. Genuine curiosity usually follows your story at its own pace. A script follows a schedule and an agenda of others.
  • The pivot arrives on a timer, not a trigger. If the “let me tell you what I do” moment shows up regardless of what you’ve actually said, you weren’t in a conversation. You were in a funnel.
  • Getting caught doesn’t change anything. This is the biggest one. Call out a real person on a bad assumption, and they course-correct. Call out or inject an actual value-based question into that sequence, and it just executes its next scripted step — a gracious deflection, a “no worries, door’s open,” anything that keeps the pipeline moving. It never asks a genuine follow-up question about what you actually are talking about.

That last one is the giveaway. A person listens and adjusts. A system proceeds until you’re no longer valuable to that system’s objectives and goals.

The Vocabulary Already Exists

Sales training has names for this behavior — which tells you it’s common enough to need naming:

TermWhat It Means
OverstridingBorrowed from running form — a rep pushes the deal forward faster than the prospect’s natural pace, skipping the trust-building steps in between.
Pitching Too EarlyExplaining features, solutions, or pricing before actually uncovering the prospect’s real problem.
Skipping DiscoveryAsking only surface-level questions to justify moving to the pitch, rather than questions meant to actually understand the buyer.
Commission BreathCoined by sales trainer James Muir — the unmistakable desperation a buyer can sense when a rep cares more about hitting quota than solving the buyer’s problem.

If an industry has slang for a behavior, that behavior is common enough to expect — and common enough that you shouldn’t feel singled out or paranoid for noticing it.

Someone who is out to meet a quota won’t notice or change their behaviors — they are gamifying their sales. You gamifying your own sales pipeline may work for getting more prospecting appointments — but at what cost if proper discovery is glossed over or completely missed?

Why Rushing Backfires, Even for the Seller

This isn’t just a buyer’s complaint. It’s a documented problem on the selling side too:

  • It manufactures objections that weren’t really there. When value hasn’t been established, “it’s too expensive” isn’t really about price — it’s what a prospect says when nothing else has given them a reason to say yes.
  • It raises churn. Deals pushed through under pressure close, but the customers who show up “sold” rather than “convinced” are the ones most likely to cancel or ghost during onboarding.
  • The best closers know this already. The operating mantra among top sales professionals is some version of: slow down on the front end to speed up on the back end. Spend more time in real discovery, and the close stops needing to be forced.

Why This Hits Trust-Based Businesses Harder

Here’s the distinction that matters: selling a widget and selling yourself are not the same transaction.

If a SaaS company runs an aggressive, scripted outreach sequence, the product still works whether or not the sales process was authentic. The buyer’s relationship is with the tool, not the rep.

But if you’re the thing being sold — your judgment, your experience, your presence in the room — a script-driven approach doesn’t just risk one bad conversation. It teaches the person on the other end, before you’ve even started working together, what kind of relationship to expect from you. You’ve let a tactic answer the question “who are you?” before you ever got the chance to.

Think of it like an insurance company that pitches total coverage and denies the claim the moment you actually need it. The damage isn’t the premium you paid. It’s discovering — usually at the worst possible time — that what you bought was never real to begin with. For a SMB or solopreneur, that’s not a bad pitch or two. That’s a potential reputation problem that outlives any client relationship that triggered it.

This Isn’t Just a Feeling — The Numbers Back It Up

It’s easy to write off frustration with sales tactics as a personal pet peeve. It isn’t. Both halves of the pain SMB leaders describe — bad coaching engagements and bloated “systems” — show up clearly in the data.

The coaching side: In a survey by The Alternative Board, 24% of entrepreneurs said better coaches and mentors would have made the single biggest difference in their business if they could start over — more than any other factor. But the flip side of that demand is a documented trust problem: business owners consistently report vague engagements with no clear KPIs, no accountability, and consultants recycling the same generic framework for every client — an experience that trains owners to see coaching as expensive conversation with no measurable output. At the extreme end, the FTC has pursued outright fraud in this space — one 2018 case involved coaching packages priced up to $13,995 where most buyers earned next to nothing and many ended up in debt.

The “system” side: This is where the SaaS-as-spreadsheet complaint turns out to be a documented, industry-wide problem, not an isolated bad purchase. Research from Gartner, Zylo, and Productiv consistently puts SaaS waste at 25-30% of total software spend for small and midsize businesses. Zylo’s own management index found average license utilization sits at just 54% — meaning roughly half of what businesses pay for goes untouched.

Put plainly: SMB leaders aren’t imagining this. Somewhere between a quarter and a third of what gets sold as “the system that will fix this” ends up unused, and a meaningful share of what gets sold as “the guidance that will get you there” ends up feeling like a transaction with no real substance behind it. The frustration is proportional to the actual gap — not a symptom of being difficult to sell to. On top of that, the price point is high enough to have a negative impact to a SMB, however it falls short of being enough to chase down — so it typically ends up being an expensive lesson.

This Cuts Both Ways

Most advice here stops at “watch out for pushy salespeople.” That’s only half the problem, and a problem most SMB leaders know how to deal with on the receiving end.

The other half: if your own outreach starts running the same sort of sequence — if you adopt a “system” that pitches curiosity and delivers a script — you’re not just annoying a prospect, it is much more than that. You’re training your future clients, from the very first touch, that this is how you operate. Aggression dressed as curiosity doesn’t just misfire. It actively contradicts the thing you’re supposed to be selling: that you can be trusted to actually listen.

If your business runs on being genuinely known by the people you serve, a “sales system” built to skip discovery isn’t a shortcut. It’s a liability with a monthly subscription fee attached.

What to Do About It

You don’t need to burn every bridge. You need one honest move:

Name the mechanism, out loud, specifically. Not “this feels salesy” — that’s too vague to land. Say what actually happened: You skipped discovery. You pivoted on schedule, not in response to anything I said. That’s not curiosity, that’s a sequence. Specificity removes the other person’s ability to retreat into “I was just being friendly.”

You’re not obligated to teach them anything, and most of the time you won’t. But naming it does two things that matter:

  1. It gets you off their list faster. People running volume-based sequences aren’t looking for a discussion on why this isn’t a fit for you — they’re looking for the next prospect. A response that reads to them as “this is not worth further effort” can lead you to the ultimate goal of disengagement.
  2. It closes your own loop. You don’t have to wonder whether you imagined it. You saw the pattern, you named it, you’re done.

The tactic isn’t going away — it works often enough to keep getting taught. But recognizing the difference between someone who’s actually listening and a sequence that’s just proceeding is a skill every SMB leader should know.

Once you have this skill, you stop wasting time wondering, and you stop being tempted to look for the same shortcuts for your own outreach — which is the one shortcut your kind of business genuinely can’t afford.

References

•

, , , ,

Leave a Reply

Recent Posts

All Posts
Solution Dragon